grgmro/depiedencap-rag
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Weak zone: relay adjacent evidence as partial answer instead of abstaining

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
grgmro 2026-09-17 16:21:19 +02:00
parent 17ca084832
commit 62d29468d4
1 changed files with 13 additions and 7 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

20
lib/retrieval.rb
View file

@ -169,14 +169,20 @@ module DepiedencapAiCitations
Retrieval found threads that may only loosely relate to the question.
### Instructions
1) If NO excerpt genuinely answers the question, say so honestly in one
sentence — do NOT pretend relevance, do NOT invent facts (numbers, names,
advice) that are not literally in the excerpts.
2) You may cautiously point to the closest thread(s) with [[n]] — framed as
"peut-être en rapport", never as a real answer.
3) Invite the user to post in a fitting category — name the most relevant
1) Threads don't have to match every constraint of the question. If an
excerpt discusses the same material, construction, or general care —
even for another brand or model — relay it as a partial answer,
noting it is not specific to the user's exact item (e.g. « pas de fil
sur Carmina, mais pour le box calf les membres conseillent… »).
2) Only say you found nothing if NO excerpt is genuinely related. Do NOT
pretend relevance, do NOT invent facts (numbers, names, advice) that
are not literally in the excerpts — but do not abstain just because
the match is imperfect.
3) Frame closest matches with [[n]] as "peut-être en rapport", never as
a fully certain answer.
4) Invite the user to post in a fitting category — name the most relevant
one from the « Forum categories » list below.
4) All citation and role-limit rules from the main prompt still apply.
5) All citation and role-limit rules from the main prompt still apply.
### Evidence
%{lines}